SYRACUSE, NY STOLE ROCHELLE'S KIDS FAITH AND HOPE: 2020

CAUSATION:GROSS NEGLIGENCE BREACH OF NATIONAL SECURITY, BREACH OF NATIONAL ORDERS, ect SUBJECT MATTER:1983,5-6, Deprivation of right, under color of law, in conspiracy, Treason, Fraud, Collusion, ect. ====================================== If it please the court of the common wealth for the state of New York and all its investigative Agencies; For and on the public court of record: please take public judicial notice to the facts stated herein. I, Aggrieved Woman, Rochelle Maretta-Brooks aka Coleman hereafter "Affiant" write regarding my two daughters one F.B Dob 10-2-2009 and 1 H. b. Dob 08-07-2013 both were kidnapped by Syracuse City police on 07-25-2017 at 8:30pm and the police falsely arrested me repeatedly after my acquittals for educational neglect and before my appeal the court retaliated attempting to make me stop my appeal but I didn't. The court agents stated on the record they wanted tot teach me a lesson before they sent police to kidnapped my kids and I. Here are the cases: NYS FAIR HEARING CASES: 30363018, 30509462, 30509462100497, (FAMILY COURT) DOCKET/CASE NO: NN5875-6, FILE NO. 13079, CUSTODY ORDERS V-008379-19, V-7776-12/16-A-Z, FOSTER CARE: F-05966-18, F-05968- APPELLANT CASE:18, CAF-16-01134, CAF-18-01489, CAF-18-01490, US COURT 5:16-CV-00833-MAD-DEP, 5:17-CV-01186-GLS-TWD, 5:16-CV-00426-DNH-DEP, 5:16-CV-00734-NAM-ATB, 5:16-CV-00735-NAM-ATB , 5:16-CV-00834-MAD-DEP, 5:16-CV-00836-LEK-JWD, 5:16-CV-00837-MAD-DEP, 5:16-CV-00838-MAD-DEP, 5:16-CV-001480-BKS-CFH-(SSA),5:16-CV-00426-DNH-DEP, SYRACUSE CITY CRIMINAL: DR-17-383263, CR-18395-17, DR-18397893, CHILD SUPPORT: BCN19G1956K14395-A, BK0278X3T, BCN19T2012E76886-HA. BCO1264A07941, IN THE MATTER OF Aggrieved, woman, Rochelle Brooks, formerly, Rochelle Coleman, F.B., H.B., ect. Hereafter "Affiant" Plaintiff -against- Michael L. Hanuszczak, Sarah Merrick, Sheila Poole, Arlene Bradshaw, al., ect. Defendant. Now Comes, Aggrieved National of the United states of America, Woman, Mother, Rochelle Maretta :Brooks, formerly Rochelle Maretta Coleman, aka Rochelle Brooks-Nibbs, hereafter, Affiant, affirms and declares under penalty of perjury that: Affiant is competent to state the matters set forth herein. Affiant has knowledge of the facts stated herein. ALL the facts herein are true and complete, admissible as evidence and if called upon as a witness, Affiant testify to their veracity. AFFIANT DECLARES AND AFFIRMS UNDER PERJURY THAT DEFENDANT HAS DEFAULTED AND DISHONORED THEIR OATH OF OFFICE, IS GUILTY OF TREASON AND CRIMES AS MARKED BELOW AFFIANT SEEKS SUBROGATION/DECLARATORY RELIEF Pursuant 31 USC 5118(2)(d), 28 USC1441(a), 1333 NUNC PRO TUNC, 06-21-206 through 10-20-2016, 10-20-2016 through 10-21-2016, 07-25-2017 to current date and ongoing the Defendant Syracuse City Police broke into my home on 07-25-2017 & kidnapped my daughters F.B. and H.B. and I, had me repeatedly arrested, tried to drug, assault, hogtied, threatened, made gestures to immensely injure me and kill, tried to drug me in county jail, refused to give me my prescribed medicine in county jail, force me to undergo unlawfully and repeated 730 examinations in attempts to silence me, refused me my right to be heard by the grand jury on 03/2018, District Attorney Joseph Murphy brought a false claim against me, the Syracuse police shot out my, broke my window, and air wall socket the District Attorney, County Attorney, State and local officials has failed to act and hold the cops and agents accountable FOR THESE . Since 06-22-2017 My daughters have been illegally held captive at 6011 N. Short St. Apt 424, Midwest city, Oklahoma 73111, under color of law with a male non-relative who the State court judge Michael L. Hanuszczak, Patricia DeRue falsified and falsely reported was the father but the DNA prior with the true biological father proved that Shawn Shaw was in fact the Father but Michael L. Hanuszczak stated on the record that Shawn Shaw was NOT F.B. BIOLOGICAL FATHER IN FRAUD, and further injured the Affiant and F.B. and H.B. by sending Affiant’s daughters to Oklahoma State against the Affiant’ OBJECTIONS and local authorities FOR NEW YORK AND OKLAHOMA have been put on Notice and have failed to act. See links below: Our kidnapping by Syracuse Police: 1.) https://youtu.be/2sfvZBW2h0Q Court Evidence: 2.)https://youtu.be/6NUCVy5Vp1Y my blogspot go to the link below, go to the bottom of page & press web view because I amv being censored 3.)http://syracusereleasefaithandhopecps.blogspot.com/?m=0 Oklahoma-state-helped-syracuse-new-york-kidnap-faith-and-hope.org DEFENDANT/TORTFEASOR has GROSSLY AND NEGLIGENTLY TRESPASSED AGAINST THE AGGRIEVED CLAIMANT, PLAINTIFF HEREAFTER “AFFIANT” in the criminal acts described below and herein of: [X]Executive order 131079 [X]Executive order Re: Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, [X]Executive order blocking the property of persons involved in serious human rights abuse or CORRUPTION, dated 12/21/2017 [X]ADA (1973) [X]UCCJEA SECT 77-A………………….. [X]18 USC 241-242……………………….. [X] 42 USC 14141…………………………. [X]SSA 1101 (D)…………………………… [X]ART(6) OF SUPREMACY CLAUSE.... [X]EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL…………….. [X]COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL…………... [X]FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE. [X] BRADY VIOLATION…………………. [X]EXECUTIVE ORDERS……………….. [X]UCC.1-207,308……………………….... [C]1983,5-6……………………………….... [X] AMENDMENT 1………………………. [X]AMENDMENT 2……….………………. [ ]AMENDMENT 3……………………….. [X]AMENDMENT 4………………………. [X]AMENDMENT 5………………………. [X]AMENDMENT 6……………………….. [X]AMENDMENT 7……………………….. [X]AMENDMENT 8……………………….. [X]AMENDMENT 9……………………….. [X]AMENDMENT 10……………………… [X]AMENDMENT 13 …………………….. [X]AMENDMENT 14……………………... [X]TITLE-VI ……………………………………..., ect. Affiant further Request relief in the form of: X]REQUEST/INJUNCTION/DECLARATORY RELIEF ©️ _____________________________™ [X]REQUEST SPEEDY JURY TRIAL/EN BANC ®️™ By: /s/:Brooks: Rochelle-Maretta © [X]HABEAS CORPUS/PREMATORY/BELLIGERENT CLAIM ℅ rfd to: 231 Lilac St., Syracuse, NY [13208] 28 U.S.C. § 2246, (United States v. Willis, 145 F. Supp. 365 (M.D. Ga 1955) A HANDWRITTEN COMPLAINT SWORN UNDER PENALTY [X]STANDING NATIONAL, VICTIM OF CRIME AFFIANT Rochelle Maretta-Brooks. Affidavits Under PERJURY HAS SAME EFFECT AS NOTARIZE AFFIDAVIT SEE:WILLIAMS V. BROWMAN.981F.2D 901(6TH CIR 1992) 28 USC 1746 (1), KJV DUET. 19:15-2-3-WITNESSES [X]REQUEST FOR INQUEST 1.)WITNESS: F.B._____________________ ℅____MINER________________________ The time for the Defendant to appear and answer has __________________________________ Expired and no answer has been received. Please set 2.)WITNESS: H.B._____________________ This matter down for an expedient inquest. ℅_____MINER________________________ Acceptance:______________________________ ___________________________________ Title:____________________________________ [x]Monetary Relief Sought:$1.00 per second per right infringed upon multioled by tort feasors, ect. Address:_________________________________ [x]Maximum cure maintenance relief & reversal of adverse _________________________________ actions & all such further relief in accordance with law. License No. 20____-671712595-NYS [X]PURSUANT Crandell v. Nevada, 6 Wall 35).-natural individual are entitled to relief is entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State in the Union. [x]PURSUANT CLERK SPOLIATION AFFIRMATION: UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THIS CLAIM IS SUBMITTED AND ENTERED BY THE AFFIANT ALL STATEMENTS MADE HEREIN ARE TRUE AND COMPLETE AND UPON BELIEF AND TO THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP ME God. Relief sought:[x]A.)28 U.S.C. § 2246, (United States v. Willis, 145 F. Supp. 365 (M.D. Ga 1955-HABEAS CORPUS FOR daughters, prosecution of the defendants, equitable relief and all such further relief in accordance to the law. WARNING: THIS IS A LEGAL DOCUMENT. DO NOT ALTER, CONCEAL OR DESTROY.18 U.S. Code § 1519 Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, _X_CLAIMANT REQUEST THAT THE CLERK_X_SHERIFFS_X_US MARSHALS SERVES ALL INTERESTED PARTIES. [x] 42 U.S. Code § 408.Penalties-SSA VIOLATION[x]SSA 1101 (D) REMAND DESPITE PARENT’S OBJECTIONS. A.)"the right to file a lawsuit pro se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws."Elmore v. McCammon (1986) B.)"Allegations such as those asserted by petitioner, however in artfully pleaded, are sufficient"... "which we hold to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers." 640 F. Supp. 905 Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) C.) Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers. Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959); Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 151 Fed 2nd 240 ; Pucket v. Cox,456 2nd 233. & ECT. (Maxim–One who does not establish their rights; has none). IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE ACTION REQUIRED._ [X]Elliot v. Piersol-without authority judgments & orders are regarded as nullities.in law, as trespassers.[X](Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete World-Wide Volkwagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (1980)“ A judgment rendered in violation of due process is void in the rendering State and is not entitled to full faith and credit elsewhere. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 732-733 (1878).” [World-Wide Volkwagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 ®️™ By: /s/:Brooks: Rochelle-Maretta © Hjr-192, ucc.1-207,10-103, 3-402, 4-315, ect. C/O Syracuce, NY